http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/ no buzzwords allowed Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/comment-page-1/#comment-637 John Rose Wed, 21 May 2008 04:51:38 +0000 http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/#comment-637 Yes. Yes.

]]> http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/comment-page-1/#comment-628 Jevgeni Kabanov Tue, 20 May 2008 10:28:26 +0000 http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/#comment-628 Thanks, John! Do I understand correctly that several CallSites can share a single StaticContext? Thanks, John! Do I understand correctly that several CallSites can share a single StaticContext?

]]> http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/comment-page-1/#comment-625 John Rose Tue, 20 May 2008 07:24:27 +0000 http://dow.ngra.de/2008/05/20/the-jsr-292-invokedynamic/#comment-625 Thanks for giving it a read! Taking your questions in reverse order: 3. Since the linkage state is a single method handle (one reference), there are no race conditions, so it's thread safe. 2. Yes, the spec. guarantees this; search for "the dynamic language can save it away". 1. Yes; see the second paragraph of the section "Target method processing". Thanks for giving it a read! Taking your questions in reverse order: 3. Since the linkage state is a single method handle (one reference), there are no race conditions, so it’s thread safe. 2. Yes, the spec. guarantees this; search for “the dynamic language can save it away”. 1. Yes; see the second paragraph of the section “Target method processing”.

]]>